John 18 - NIV Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible
18:1–19:42 When ancient biographers wrote about a person whose death was significant (e.g., a martyr), they generally devoted significant space to recounting the person’s death.
18:1 crossed the Kidron Valley. Rainy season filled the Kidron brook, but at this time of year it was merely an easily crossed ravine.
18:3 detachment of soldiers and some officials. Because the military terminology in this context (e.g., the Greek term translated “detachment” here) was often used for Roman military units, some scholars believe that the arrest force is Roman. Others counter that the same terminology appears for Jewish units; that the group is led by chief priests and Pharisees; that Roman soldiers would not have escorted Jesus for interrogation by Annas (v. 13), whom a Roman governor had deposed from office; and that Pilate seems initially unfamiliar with the charges and arrest (vv. 29, 31). On this latter view, these are probably members of the Levite police, as in the other Gospels (see note on Mk 14:43). torches, lanterns and weapons. Groups traveling at night carried torches or lanterns, but not everyone in the group would need to carry them.
18:5 I am he. The Greek phrase used here can also be rendered, “I am” (see note on 8:24), which declares Jesus’ deity (Ex 3:14; see note on Jn 8:58).
18:6 drew back and fell to the ground. If the guards had heard of Jesus’ power and thought of him as a dangerous sorcerer, they may have fallen back in fear; they might know the Jewish tradition that Pharaoh fell when Moses pronounced the divine name. Beyond this, both Scripture (1Sa 19:24; Eze 1:28; Da 10:9) and subsequent history offer examples of people overwhelmed by God’s majesty or whose nervous systems were so overcome, often with terror at God’s presence, that they fell down.
18:8 let these men go. If followers were unarmed, authorities sometimes chose to stop movements by arresting the leader; disillusioned followers would normally scatter afterward, as here.
18:10 high priest’s servant. A personal servant of the high priest could wield much authority, including over the temple police if this was included in his instructions.
18:12–24 On the trial narratives, see the article “Jesus’ Trial.”
18:13 Annas . . . father-in-law of Caiaphas. Annas was not only the father-in-law of Caiaphas but also the father of five sons, all of whom became high priests in the first century. Annas had held the office himself from AD 6 through 15, when the Roman governor replaced him (against Jewish custom), but through his family he continued to influence local politics until he died in AD 35. Surviving sources from other Jewish circles view him negatively. Ancient legal ethics looked down on interrogating a prisoner in one’s home, but the hearing for more official purposes will come later (v. 24). that year. On Caiaphas and his priesthood “that year,” see note on 11:49.
18:15 courtyard. See note on Lk 22:55. Servants guarded the gates in outer walls of ample homes; the wealthiest, such as eminent members of the high priestly family, would have servants whose regular duties included watching the gate. Visitors unfamiliar to the gatekeeper would arouse more suspicion, particularly at night and if their clothing showed that they did not belong to the Levite guards or to households of the elite. Guards would normally screen out visitors of lower social station from this prominent home, and those of lower social station would normally not expect to be admitted.
18:18 It was cold. Given its elevation, Jerusalem can be cool at night in April.
18:20 said nothing in secret. Those whose teachings were secretive were considered subversive. Teachings of those who taught in public were also easily verifiable by numerous witnesses (a key issue in the much later debate between Gnostics, who claimed unverifiable secret traditions from the first apostles, and mainstream Christians, who appealed to early and public attestation for their beliefs).
18:22 slapped him in the face. A blow to the cheek functioned as a severe insult in antiquity. God’s servants sometimes experienced this (1Ki 22:24; 2Ch 18:23).
18:23 But if I spoke the truth, why did you strike me? By all ancient official approaches to legal ethics, it is Jesus’ captors, not Jesus himself, who are transgressing, as Jesus points out. Interrogation in a private home at night without prior notice of a hearing violated legal ideals; striking an unconvicted prisoner was even more problematic.
18:25 He denied it. A disciple’s denial would shame the teacher. Because many ancient hearers would feel that such behavior reflected badly not only on this important disciple but also on Jesus who chose him, nearly all scholars agree that ancient Christians would never have invented such a story.
18:28 palace. The splendid palace of Herod the Great, used by governors when they came to Jerusalem during festivals to prevent unrest. early morning. See note on Mt 27:1. to avoid ceremonial uncleanness they did not enter the palace. Because worshipers of other gods were deemed ritually unclean, religiously strict Judeans would not enter their homes; to do so would render the Judeans themselves too impure to eat the Passover (or to eat unleavened bread the next day, on a different chronology; by this period many people blended Passover with the Festival of Unleavened Bread; see the article “The Synoptic Passover Meal Versus John’s Passover Lamb”). Archaeology demonstrates that the chief priests were indeed scrupulous about ritual purity.
18:29 Pilate came out to them. See note on v. 28. An urgent threat to peace invited the governor to intervene directly and militarily, but under normal circumstances the governor would wait for accusers to bring charges. Discovering and charging those who subverted public order was especially the duty of local elites.
18:31 judge him by your own law. Governors normally refused jurisdiction over charges that were not offenses under Roman law, including violation of local religious customs. Such offenses were to be tried by local courts. The governor’s decision was necessary in capital cases, however; throughout the provinces, Rome normally reserved for its own officials the right to pronounce death sentences, thereby preventing locals from harming those possibly loyal to Rome. Pilate, who was governor of Judea from AD 26 to 36, was known for not cooperating with the Judean elite except in cases where the fallout from not cooperating would be too great (as in 19:12–15). At about this time, e.g., Pilate minted a coin with a pagan image that offended Judea’s Jewish residents. Many scholars suggest that Sejanus, the praetorian prefect who ran Rome for Tiberius, was Pilate’s patron; if this surmise is true, Pilate’s position was relatively secure until Sejanus’s disgrace and execution in AD 31. After that Pilate would have needed to act more cautiously.
18:32 the kind of death. Ancient Jewish law decreed stoning for blasphemy, but a Roman execution for treason warranted the slow public death involved in crucifixion. Cf. note on 12:32.
18:33 Are you the king of the Jews? As governor, Pilate had complete freedom in the case, but proper procedure was normally to inquire into the charges. The charge in this case is that Jesus claimed to be “king of the Jews”—a title that, if not bestowed by the emperor, constituted treason, a capital offense.
18:35 Your own people and chief priests handed you over. Roman infrastructure in the provinces was limited; Rome depended on local elites to charge subversives.
18:36 My kingdom is not of this world. Rome’s concern was with military and political threats—not with idealistic sages. From Rome, Pilate undoubtedly knew of the many apolitical sages (especially Cynics) who taught their followers how to “reign” in life as if “kings” yet were deemed by the elite as curiosities or laughable rather than relevant to the political order. They spoke about truth but proved harmless. To Pilate, Jesus must have seemed such a sage.
18:39 it is your custom. Governors were free to follow or disregard precedent, but they often retained popular precedents. Most provincial customs, including this one, are unattested, but this custom is not at all unlikely; similar customs are attested elsewhere. Given Jesus’ title, Pilate probably expects him to prove more popular than the other prisoners.
18:40 had taken part in an uprising. This phrase reflects a Greek term that can mean simply “robber” (as in 10:1) or can mean, as often in Josephus, a revolutionary (Mk 15:7). Some scholars suggest that some robbers may have been both—part of a marauding band in the countryside that also resisted oppressive elites.
About this Study Bible
